<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: PHP Performance &#8211; isset() versus empty() versus PHP Notices	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.brandonchecketts.com/archives/php-performance-isset-versus-empty-versus-php-notices/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.brandonchecketts.com/archives/php-performance-isset-versus-empty-versus-php-notices</link>
	<description>Web Programming, Linux System Administation, and Entrepreneurship in Athens Georgia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Oct 2019 14:56:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Menoblack		</title>
		<link>https://www.brandonchecketts.com/archives/php-performance-isset-versus-empty-versus-php-notices/comment-page-1#comment-90026</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Menoblack]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Oct 2019 14:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandonchecketts.com/archives/php-performance-isset-versus-empty-versus-php-notices#comment-90026</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Been a few years so I did the same check as Frode BÃ¸rli, my results were:

if($a): 6.3749399185181 (error reporting to log) -avoid this no matter what haha
if($a): 0.35815000534058 (no error reporting) -almost 10 times as slow as isset()
isset($a): 0.039632081985474 
isset($a) &#038;&#038; $a: 0.046839952468872 
doempty($a): 0.039687871932983 
!empty($a) &#038;&#038; $a: 0.053149938583374]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Been a few years so I did the same check as Frode BÃ¸rli, my results were:</p>
<p>if($a): 6.3749399185181 (error reporting to log) -avoid this no matter what haha<br />
if($a): 0.35815000534058 (no error reporting) -almost 10 times as slow as isset()<br />
isset($a): 0.039632081985474<br />
isset($a) &amp;&amp; $a: 0.046839952468872<br />
doempty($a): 0.039687871932983<br />
!empty($a) &amp;&amp; $a: 0.053149938583374</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: fyrye		</title>
		<link>https://www.brandonchecketts.com/archives/php-performance-isset-versus-empty-versus-php-notices/comment-page-1#comment-5901</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fyrye]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2014 18:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandonchecketts.com/archives/php-performance-isset-versus-empty-versus-php-notices#comment-5901</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The issue with using !empty() or if ($somevar) is that it will evaluate to false when supplied: array(), null, 0, false, and &quot;&quot;

Where !empty($somevar) is a dropin replacement for if ($somevar) to avoid declaration errors.
You should always define, typecast, and test your variables appropriately to ensure your data is accurate, as opposed to relying solely on !empty()
eg: if (null === $somevar) or if (0 === $somevar)
If an undefined variable notice is generated. Fix the notice as it represents a logic error in the code and is potentially harmful to your application.
There are no excuses for lazy/bad coding practices.

Additionally until 5.5 empty could only be used with variables, making things like if (empty(trim($var))) resulted in an error.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The issue with using !empty() or if ($somevar) is that it will evaluate to false when supplied: array(), null, 0, false, and &#8220;&#8221;</p>
<p>Where !empty($somevar) is a dropin replacement for if ($somevar) to avoid declaration errors.<br />
You should always define, typecast, and test your variables appropriately to ensure your data is accurate, as opposed to relying solely on !empty()<br />
eg: if (null === $somevar) or if (0 === $somevar)<br />
If an undefined variable notice is generated. Fix the notice as it represents a logic error in the code and is potentially harmful to your application.<br />
There are no excuses for lazy/bad coding practices.</p>
<p>Additionally until 5.5 empty could only be used with variables, making things like if (empty(trim($var))) resulted in an error.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: rollo		</title>
		<link>https://www.brandonchecketts.com/archives/php-performance-isset-versus-empty-versus-php-notices/comment-page-1#comment-5625</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rollo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2014 10:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandonchecketts.com/archives/php-performance-isset-versus-empty-versus-php-notices#comment-5625</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Lucas is wrong. empty() does NOT produce E_NOTICE on undeclared variables.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lucas is wrong. empty() does NOT produce E_NOTICE on undeclared variables.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Janek		</title>
		<link>https://www.brandonchecketts.com/archives/php-performance-isset-versus-empty-versus-php-notices/comment-page-1#comment-2778</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Janek]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 10:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandonchecketts.com/archives/php-performance-isset-versus-empty-versus-php-notices#comment-2778</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@Lucas: do you mean using empty($a) where $a doesn&#039;t exist? This seems to work fine without a notice..]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Lucas: do you mean using empty($a) where $a doesn&#8217;t exist? This seems to work fine without a notice..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Frode BÃ¸rli		</title>
		<link>https://www.brandonchecketts.com/archives/php-performance-isset-versus-empty-versus-php-notices/comment-page-1#comment-2713</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frode BÃ¸rli]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 18:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandonchecketts.com/archives/php-performance-isset-versus-empty-versus-php-notices#comment-2713</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This test is wrong. Remember that $a will be declared after the first attempt to generate a notice. No subsequent accesses will generate a notice. This test is more correct, since the test is done inside a function so A will actually not be declared.

&#060;?php
        function doNotice() {
                if($a) echo &#034;AH!&#034;;
        }

        function doIsset() {
                if(isset($a)) echo &#034;AH!&#034;;
        }

        function doBoth() {
                if(isset($a) &#038;&#038; $a) echo &#034;AH!&#034;;
        }

        function doEmpty() {
                if(!empty($a)) echo &#034;AH!&#034;;
        }

        $t = microtime(true);
        for($i = 0; $i &#060; 1000000; $i++)
                doNotice();
        echo &#039;if($a): &#039;.(microtime(true)-$t).&#034;\n&#034;;

        $t = microtime(true);
        for($i = 0; $i &#060; 1000000; $i++)
                doIsset();
        echo &#039;isset($a): &#039;.(microtime(true)-$t).&#034;\n&#034;;

        $t = microtime(true);
        for($i = 0; $i &#060; 1000000; $i++)
                doBoth();
        echo &#039;isset($a) &#038;&#038; $a: &#039;.(microtime(true)-$t).&#034;\n&#034;;

        $t = microtime(true);
        for($i = 0; $i 

Which gives the following results:

if($a): 0.63301992416382
isset($a): 0.26364302635193
isset($a) &#038;&#038; $a: 0.27497410774231
empty($a): 0.26639103889465

Even this is slightly faster:

isset($a); // Just to make sure it is declared.
if($a) { }]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This test is wrong. Remember that $a will be declared after the first attempt to generate a notice. No subsequent accesses will generate a notice. This test is more correct, since the test is done inside a function so A will actually not be declared.</p>
<p>&lt;?php<br />
        function doNotice() {<br />
                if($a) echo &quot;AH!&quot;;<br />
        }</p>
<p>        function doIsset() {<br />
                if(isset($a)) echo &quot;AH!&quot;;<br />
        }</p>
<p>        function doBoth() {<br />
                if(isset($a) &amp;&amp; $a) echo &quot;AH!&quot;;<br />
        }</p>
<p>        function doEmpty() {<br />
                if(!empty($a)) echo &quot;AH!&quot;;<br />
        }</p>
<p>        $t = microtime(true);<br />
        for($i = 0; $i &lt; 1000000; $i++)<br />
                doNotice();<br />
        echo &#039;if($a): &#039;.(microtime(true)-$t).&quot;\n&quot;;</p>
<p>        $t = microtime(true);<br />
        for($i = 0; $i &lt; 1000000; $i++)<br />
                doIsset();<br />
        echo &#039;isset($a): &#039;.(microtime(true)-$t).&quot;\n&quot;;</p>
<p>        $t = microtime(true);<br />
        for($i = 0; $i &lt; 1000000; $i++)<br />
                doBoth();<br />
        echo &#039;isset($a) &amp;&amp; $a: &#039;.(microtime(true)-$t).&quot;\n&quot;;</p>
<p>        $t = microtime(true);<br />
        for($i = 0; $i </p>
<p>Which gives the following results:</p>
<p>if($a): 0.63301992416382<br />
isset($a): 0.26364302635193<br />
isset($a) &amp;&amp; $a: 0.27497410774231<br />
empty($a): 0.26639103889465</p>
<p>Even this is slightly faster:</p>
<p>isset($a); // Just to make sure it is declared.<br />
if($a) { }</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Lucas		</title>
		<link>https://www.brandonchecketts.com/archives/php-performance-isset-versus-empty-versus-php-notices/comment-page-1#comment-1816</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lucas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 19:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandonchecketts.com/archives/php-performance-isset-versus-empty-versus-php-notices#comment-1816</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The functions have the different propouse, if u try to use empty on not existent variable, that return a NOTICE]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The functions have the different propouse, if u try to use empty on not existent variable, that return a NOTICE</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tiago Marques		</title>
		<link>https://www.brandonchecketts.com/archives/php-performance-isset-versus-empty-versus-php-notices/comment-page-1#comment-1782</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tiago Marques]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 16:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandonchecketts.com/archives/php-performance-isset-versus-empty-versus-php-notices#comment-1782</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Great post. I was also wondering about this.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post. I was also wondering about this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
